Lower Thames Crossing: Difference between revisions
From Transport Knowledge Wiki
→top: add navigation |
remove whitespace |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| archive_url = {{archive link |archived_url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241002051536/https://transportactionnetwork.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/TAN-LTC-iPDF.pdf | archived_date=2 October 2024 }} | | archive_url = {{archive link |archived_url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241002051536/https://transportactionnetwork.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/TAN-LTC-iPDF.pdf | archived_date=2 October 2024 }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Footer}} | {{Footer}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:52, 28 February 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Publication record
| |
|---|---|
| Title | Lower Thames Crossing |
| Subtitle | A dinosaur scheme from another era that really should be extinct |
| Publisher | Transport Action Network
|
| Date |  September 2024
|
| Summary, keywords and locations | |
| Summary | Explains why Lower Thames Crossing is a poor choice for transport in North Kent and South Essex. |
| Keywords | Air pollution Car dependency Economy Electric vehicles Emissions Traffic
|
| Locations | England Kent Essex
|
| How to find this document | |
| Publication |  Live as of 2 October 2024
|
| Archive |  Archived on 2 October 2024
|
 This is a page on Transport Knowledge WikiThe home of sustainable transport knowledge |
| Found this useful? Please donate to help with running costs |
