The Politics of Potholes: Difference between revisions
From Transport Knowledge Wiki
→top: add navigation |
remove whitespace |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| open_access = {{open access | test_date=20 February 2025}} | | open_access = {{open access | test_date=20 February 2025}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Footer}} | {{Footer}} | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Politics of Potholes, The}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Politics of Potholes, The}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:59, 28 February 2025
| Title | The Politics of Potholes: Service Quality and Retrospective Voting in Local Elections |
| Journal | |
| Abstract | By conditioning their support for political incumbents on observed performance outcomes, voters can motivate elected officials to represent their interests faithfully while in office. Whether elections serve this function in sub-national U.S. government remains unclear, however, because much of the existing research on retrospective voting in these contexts focuses on outcomes that are not obviously salient to voters or over which the relevant government officials have limited influence. In this study, we examine one outcome -- the quality of local roads -- that is both salient and unquestionably under the control of city government. Our analysis leverages within-city variation in the number of pothole complaints in one of America's largest cities and shows that such variation can explain neighborhood-level differences in support for incumbents in two political offices -- mayor and city council -- across several electoral cycles. |
| Authors | |
| Date | |
| Keywords and locations | |
| Keywords | |
| Locations | |
| How to find and cite this journal article | |
| Publication | |
| Access | This journal article is open access and can be read for free as of 20 February 2025. |
| Citation | Burnett, Craig M. and Kogan, Vladimir, The Politics of Potholes: Service Quality and Retrospective Voting in Local Elections (July 20, 2016). Journal of Politics (2017, Vol. 79, No. 1): pp. 302-314. |
The home of sustainable transport knowledge |
| Found this useful? Please donate to help with running costs |
