Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas/featured: Difference between revisions

From Transport Knowledge Wiki
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
|right
No edit summary
 
Line 7: Line 7:
| image              = [[File:Demand responsive transport vehicle in Leicester.jpg|200px|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.|right]]
| image              = [[File:Demand responsive transport vehicle in Leicester.jpg|200px|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.|right]]
| metadata          = {{journal link|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link|Bartosz|Bursa}}‎ {{author link|Nils|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link|Ferdinand|Ebner}} {{author link|Markus|Mailer}} {{keyword link|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link|Traffic‎}} {{location link|Austria}}
| metadata          = {{journal link|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link|Bartosz|Bursa}}‎ {{author link|Nils|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link|Ferdinand|Ebner}} {{author link|Markus|Mailer}} {{keyword link|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link|Traffic‎}} {{location link|Austria}}
}}
}}<noinclude>[[Category:Featured content]]</noinclude>

Latest revision as of 04:52, 11 July 2026

Journal article Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas Date June 2026‎
Analysis of user motivations, ridership, and side effects of an app-based demand-responsive transit
In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.
"Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."
Journal Journal of Urban Mobility‎ (1)‎ Author Bartosz Bursa (1)‎‎ Author Nils Rabeneick (1)‎‎ Author Ferdinand Ebner (1)‎ Author Markus Mailer (1)‎ Keyword Shared mobility (2)‎ Keyword Traffic‎ (44) Location Austria (2)
Retrieved from "https://transportknowledge.net/index.php?title=Benefits_and_harms_of_DRT_in_suburban_areas/featured&oldid=11534"