Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas/featured - Revision history

Steve.chambers at 03:52, 11 July 2026

2026-07-11T03:52:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 11 July 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\| image = [[File:Demand responsive transport vehicle in Leicester.jpg\|200px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.\|right]]		\| image = [[File:Demand responsive transport vehicle in Leicester.jpg\|200px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.\|right]]
	\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}		\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}
	}}		}}<noinclude>[[Category:Featured content]]</noinclude>

Steve.chambers: |right

2026-07-10T13:07:56Z

|right

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:07, 10 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎		\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎
	\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."		\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."
	\| image = [[File:Demand responsive transport vehicle in Leicester.jpg\|200px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]		\| image = [[File:Demand responsive transport vehicle in Leicester.jpg\|200px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.\|right]]
	\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}		\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}
	}}		}}

Steve.chambers at 07:00, 10 July 2026

2026-07-10T07:00:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:00, 10 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎		\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎
	\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."		\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."
	\| image = [[File:Demand ~~response~~.jpg\|200px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]		\| image = [[File:Demand responsive transport vehicle in Leicester.jpg\|200px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]
	\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}		\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}
	}}		}}

Steve.chambers at 10:23, 9 July 2026

2026-07-09T10:23:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 9 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎		\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎
	\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."		\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."
	\| image = [[File:~~Journal urban mobility~~.jpg\|~~100px~~\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]		\| image = [[File:Demand response.jpg\|200px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]
	\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}		\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}
	}}		}}

Steve.chambers at 09:48, 9 July 2026

2026-07-09T09:48:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 9 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎		\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎
	\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."		\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."
	\| image = [[File:Journal urban mobility.jpg\|~~150px~~\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]		\| image = [[File:Journal urban mobility.jpg\|100px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]
	\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}		\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}
	}}		}}

Steve.chambers at 09:25, 9 July 2026

2026-07-09T09:25:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:25, 9 July 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎		\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎
	\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."		\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."
	\| image = [[File:~~Demand response~~.jpg\|~~200px~~\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]		\| image = [[File:Journal urban mobility.jpg\|150px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]
	\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}		\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}
	}}		}}

Steve.chambers at 05:55, 9 July 2026

2026-07-09T05:55:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, 9 July 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| title = [[Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas]]		\| title = [[Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas]]
	\| subtitle = Analysis of user motivations, ridership, and side effects of an app-based demand-responsive transit		\| subtitle = Analysis of user motivations, ridership, and side effects of an app-based demand-responsive transit
	\| date = June ~~2026‎~~		\| date = {{date link\|June 2026}}‎
	\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."		\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."
	\| image = [[File:Demand response.jpg\|200px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]		\| image = [[File:Demand response.jpg\|200px\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas\|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]
	\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}		\| metadata = {{journal link\|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link\|Bartosz\|Bursa}}‎ {{author link\|Nils\|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link\|Ferdinand\|Ebner}} {{author link\|Markus\|Mailer}} {{keyword link\|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link\|Traffic‎}} {{location link\|Austria}}
	}}		}}

Steve.chambers at 16:11, 8 July 2026

2026-07-08T16:11:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 8 July 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\| publication_symbol = {{Journal article symbol\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas}}		\| publication_symbol = {{Journal article symbol\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas}}
	\| title = [[Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas]]		\| title = [[Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas]]
			\| subtitle = Analysis of user motivations, ridership, and side effects of an app-based demand-responsive transit
	\| date = June 2026‎		\| date = June 2026‎
	\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."		\| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."

Steve.chambers at 16:10, 8 July 2026

2026-07-08T16:10:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:10, 8 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{featured content		{{featured content
	\| publication_symbol = {{Journal article symbol}}		\| publication_symbol = {{Journal article symbol\|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas}}
	\| title = [[Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas]]		\| title = [[Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas]]
	\| date = June 2026‎		\| date = June 2026‎

Steve.chambers: Created page with "{{featured content | publication_symbol = {{Journal article symbol}} | title = Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas | date = June 2026‎ | summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, a..."

2026-07-08T14:52:41Z

Created page with "{{featured content | publication_symbol = {{Journal article symbol}} | title = Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas | date = June 2026‎ | summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, a..."

New page

{{featured content
| publication_symbol = {{Journal article symbol}}
| title = [[Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas]]
| date = June 2026‎
| summary = "Since the rebirth of demand-responsive transit (DRT) after 2010 many failed and discontinued initiatives have been observed. The issues range from inadequate technology, ill-defined spatial and temporal conditions, to missing knowledge of user preferences, low ridership, and of course funding, since many trials are ceased once the subsidy is stopped. In this paper, we explore the use and effects of an app-based DRT in a suburban environment based on the data collected from users and non-users of a newly launched service in Austria. The results indicate that the service performs well as a feeder mode for rail transportation with positive user reviews. However, there are concerns about a limited operating area, too short operating hours and low pooling effects (occupancy rates)."
| image = [[File:Demand response.jpg|200px|link=Benefits and harms of DRT in suburban areas|alt=In a built-up area two men board a small bus with Arriva Click written on it.]]
| metadata = {{journal link|Journal of Urban Mobility‎}} {{author link|Bartosz|Bursa}}‎ {{author link|Nils|Rabeneick}}‎ {{author link|Ferdinand|Ebner}} {{author link|Markus|Mailer}} {{keyword link|Shared mobility}}‎ {{Keyword link|Traffic‎}} {{location link|Austria}}
}}